• MEMBER LOGIN
Alberta Cattle Feeders' Association
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • What We Do
  • Alberta Livestock Power Services
  • Our Industry
    • Feedlot 101
    • History in Alberta
  • News
    • ACFA in the news
  • Events
    • Alberta Beef Industry Conference
  • Membership
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

4 ways proposed changes to the Canada Food Guide could be bad for our health

August 17, 2017/in Beef industry, Issues

For 40 years, Health Canada has urged Canadians to follow its dietary guidelines, and using the Canada Food Guide is considered a basic reference when it comes to healthy eating.

As we learn more about nutrition and health, it makes sense that recommendations will change over time, and the Guide should be kept updated. But recently proposed changes have many people, including doctors, worried.

Of particular concern to Canada’s beef industry is a recommendation that Canadians eat less meat. They are encouraged to replace animal proteins with plant-based proteins, partly for health reasons and partly for environmental considerations.

Why 717 Canadian physicians disagree with Health Canada

In July 2017, a group of 717 Canadian physicians and allied health professionals sent an open letter to the Canadian Office of Nutrition Policy and Promotion expressing their concerns about several aspects of the new Guide, including the recommendation to eat less red meat. These health professionals have been successfully using food and diet to help reverse disease and made the following points:

    • The Guide continues to recommend reducing consumption of saturated fats, despite “essentially overwhelming evidence now that saturated fat is not harmful in the diet and does not cause heart disease, but rather that the low fat dietary pattern has very likely caused harm”.
    • The caution against red meat does not stand up to “rigorous clinical trial data which does not demonstrate any negative health consequences from eating meat.” The physicians cited a recent review which shows no negative influence on cardiovascular risk factors with red meat intake of more than 0.5 servings per day.

“The advice to eat less red meat may already be having some unintended consequences. A recent report by Public Health England shows that 25% of working age women do not have enough iron in their diet, and that almost half of teenage girls are at risk of iron-deficiency anemia. Encouraging all population groups to eat less red and processed meat … is not helpful and places women at risk of iron deficiency and related anemia.”

You can read the full letter here.

Four ways the new Guide could be counter-productive

    1. The Guide plans to eliminate the meat category and replace it with a proteins category. The implication that all proteins are created equal is misleading – red meats are the best source of high-quality, dietary protein relative to caloric intake.
    2. Red meats are an excellent part of a balanced diet because they are so rich in nutrients such as zinc, iron and Vitamin B12.
    3. Saturated fats are now known to play an important role in a healthy, balanced diet.
    4. Dietary guidelines should be first and foremost about nutrition, rather than environmental considerations.

Why environmental considerations don’t belong in nutritional recommendations

Nutrition and the environment are diverse issues that should not be confused. According to Tom Lynch-Staunton, issues manager for the Canadian Cattlemen’s Association, “it’s absolutely important for us as an industry to look at ways to improve our environmental impacts, but the food guide should be about nutrition; about human health, which is complex enough.”

“The Guide should provide recommendations for a variety of different diets so that people can get the best nutrition possible, and not confuse that with other issues such as the environment.”

Tom also explained that the environmental impacts of agriculture as an industry are incredibly complex.

“It’s very misleading to look at one measurement, such as greenhouse gas emissions per pound of beef,” he said. “Although the data suggests that cattle produce the most methane emissions of any livestock, we also know that cattle can provide great benefits to the environment – they use food sources that we can’t use, such as feed grains or crop residues, and they are able to graze natural grasslands that aren’t very well suited to farming crops or vegetables. We also know that grasslands promote biodiversity, providing wildlife habitat, a water filtration system and nutrient dispersion, as well as storing huge amounts of carbon.”

You can read about some of the research into greenhouse gas emissions in these blog posts:

    • From oil and gas to bovine gas, measuring GHG emissions is an important part of setting targets
    • Emissions research part 2 – helping cattle feeders reduce their impact on the environment and on their neighbours
Tags: beef, Canada Food Guide, Canadian Cattlemen's Association, detrimental, dietary guidelines, emissions, environment, environmental impacts, greenhouse gas emissions, guide, health, Health Canada, nutrition, physicians, protein, recommendations, red meat, saturated fats, Tom Lynch-Staunton, update
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://cattlefeeders.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/pexels-photo-128401-e1502981680989.jpg 467 700 Team /wp-content/uploads/2020/02/ACFA-web-logo.png Team2017-08-17 13:00:132020-01-28 14:24:204 ways proposed changes to the Canada Food Guide could be bad for our health
You might also like
Canada’s Food Guide leaves room for beef on the table
How regulatory changes could help trade with the U.S.
Canada’s chief vet works to minimize animal health risks
A year of speaking up for cattle feeders
3 challenges facing Alberta’s beef industry
Environmental stewardship is a science at Harmony Beef
13 replies

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. 토토세콤 says:
    December 23, 2022 at 1:56 am

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 11186 more Information on that Topic: cattlefeeders.ca/4-ways-proposed-changes-to-the-canada-food-guide-could-be-bad-for-our-health/ […]

  2. price of mushrooms online 50 off says:
    November 12, 2022 at 12:57 am

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: cattlefeeders.ca/4-ways-proposed-changes-to-the-canada-food-guide-could-be-bad-for-our-health/ […]

  3. เพื่อนแท้ เงินด่วนชุมแพ says:
    October 11, 2022 at 9:08 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Info here to that Topic: cattlefeeders.ca/4-ways-proposed-changes-to-the-canada-food-guide-could-be-bad-for-our-health/ […]

  4. savoir plus says:
    October 5, 2022 at 4:56 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More here to that Topic: cattlefeeders.ca/4-ways-proposed-changes-to-the-canada-food-guide-could-be-bad-for-our-health/ […]

  5. wholesale liquor for sale online says:
    September 18, 2022 at 5:44 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: cattlefeeders.ca/4-ways-proposed-changes-to-the-canada-food-guide-could-be-bad-for-our-health/ […]

  6. wow slot says:
    August 27, 2022 at 3:36 am

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here to that Topic: cattlefeeders.ca/4-ways-proposed-changes-to-the-canada-food-guide-could-be-bad-for-our-health/ […]

  7. buy magic mushrooms online peth says:
    August 26, 2022 at 11:15 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info on that Topic: cattlefeeders.ca/4-ways-proposed-changes-to-the-canada-food-guide-could-be-bad-for-our-health/ […]

  8. Bob Biswas Full Movie says:
    August 13, 2022 at 8:31 am

    a

    a

  9. smith&wesson gun says:
    August 12, 2022 at 5:31 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More to that Topic: cattlefeeders.ca/4-ways-proposed-changes-to-the-canada-food-guide-could-be-bad-for-our-health/ […]

  10. devops advice says:
    May 19, 2022 at 8:45 am

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 67933 additional Info to that Topic: cattlefeeders.ca/4-ways-proposed-changes-to-the-canada-food-guide-could-be-bad-for-our-health/ […]

  11. สล็อตวอเลท says:
    April 23, 2022 at 11:06 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More to that Topic: cattlefeeders.ca/4-ways-proposed-changes-to-the-canada-food-guide-could-be-bad-for-our-health/ […]

  12. Get the facts says:
    April 16, 2022 at 2:16 am

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: cattlefeeders.ca/4-ways-proposed-changes-to-the-canada-food-guide-could-be-bad-for-our-health/ […]

  13. colorado dispensary shipping worldwide says:
    March 8, 2022 at 10:33 am

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on to that Topic: cattlefeeders.ca/4-ways-proposed-changes-to-the-canada-food-guide-could-be-bad-for-our-health/ […]

Comments are closed.

Search Search

Sign up for The Feed Newsletter!

The Feed Archives

Check us out on Facebook

Recent Posts

  • Reimagining Immigration Letter to the Honourable Lena Diab
  • Do Canadians Want to Work at Feedlots?
  • Letter to Premier Re: Loss of Agricultural Land
  • Vice President, Policy & Government Relations Position
  • Letter to Minister re: Bill 26, The Immigration Oversight Act

Archives

Contact ACFA

Alberta Cattle Feeders’ Association
#200, 7100 – 112 Ave SE, Calgary, AB, T2C 4Z1

(403) 250-2509

General Inquiries:
[email protected]

What’s New

  • Reimagining Immigration Letter to the Honourable Lena Diab October 22, 2026
  • Do Canadians Want to Work at Feedlots? August 24, 2026
  • Letter to Premier Re: Loss of Agricultural Land August 12, 2026

ACFA Membership

Information

Benefits

Levels

© Copyright 2020 Alberta Cattle Feeders Association | Thank you to LITTLE ROCK PRINTING for their support and printing services
  • Link to X
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to Instagram
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top